<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An ethical framework for news operations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/</link>
	<description>studying the media ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>One part I don&#039;t know what to think about is this:
&quot;Written ethics guidelines ...are an essential ingredient ...[and]will be most useful if &lt;b&gt;framed as aspirations as opposed to rules&lt;/b&gt;&quot;
...which doesn&#039;t mesh with ISO9000&#039;s  &quot;Say what you do and do what you say&quot;
...which also doesn&#039;t mesh with mindblowers like Enron&#039;s code of ethics
(quite lofty, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonworks.boston.com/globe/job_doc/archives/060202.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)

Empirically, does an &quot;aspirations&quot; code of ethics work better than a &quot;rules&quot; one?
And where&#039;s the discussion on this? Poynter has an Ethics Wiki but IMO wikis aren&#039;t suited to discussion, which kind of ensures that it *won&#039;t* be discussed. (at least not in a venue I&#039;m aware of)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One part I don&#8217;t know what to think about is this:<br />
&#8220;Written ethics guidelines &#8230;are an essential ingredient &#8230;[and]will be most useful if <b>framed as aspirations as opposed to rules</b>&#8221;<br />
&#8230;which doesn&#8217;t mesh with ISO9000&#8242;s  &#8220;Say what you do and do what you say&#8221;<br />
&#8230;which also doesn&#8217;t mesh with mindblowers like Enron&#8217;s code of ethics<br />
(quite lofty, in <a href="http://bostonworks.boston.com/globe/job_doc/archives/060202.shtml" rel="nofollow">here</a>)</p>
<p>Empirically, does an &#8220;aspirations&#8221; code of ethics work better than a &#8220;rules&#8221; one?<br />
And where&#8217;s the discussion on this? Poynter has an Ethics Wiki but IMO wikis aren&#8217;t suited to discussion, which kind of ensures that it *won&#8217;t* be discussed. (at least not in a venue I&#8217;m aware of)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Monday squibs</title>
		<link>http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Monday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minimediaguy.org/2007/02/19/an-ethical-framework-for-news-operations/#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>[...] An ethical framework for news operations. Tom Abate examines the need for &#8212; and steps toward &#8212; an ethical grounding in a new age of journalism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An ethical framework for news operations. Tom Abate examines the need for &mdash; and steps toward &mdash; an ethical grounding in a new age of journalism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

