This icon is from Chinese Law Professor Blog where we learn that Chinese officials will no longer harvest organs from prisoners, except under certain circumstances. (details)
Waiting in an office in San Francisco recently I was thumbing through a book, ”The Art of Calligraphy in Modern China,” when a passage caught my eye. I copied it down. I assume these are the words of book editor Gordon Barrass:
“In China the power of the written word was never challenged by a culture of political oratory as it was in the west. Never in China’s long history has there been the equivalent of the Areopagus where the great Athenian debates took place or the Roman senate. Nor has there been a political orator such as Demosthenes or Cicero. Chinese rulers expressed their power and promulgted their through written edicts.”
That helps explain the ferocity with which Chinese rulers seem bent on squechling dissent on the Internet. Reporters San Frontiers recently exposed how an array of bureaucracies censor 1.3 million websites and 160 million Internet users. “The Internet’s promise of free expression and information has been nipped in the bud by the Chinese government’s online censorship and surveillance system,” according to the report. (download)
China has long been a fascination. I studied Chinese language and history at UC Berkeley, and recall in particular one class taught by noted Chinese historian Frederic Wakeman (obituary ) about the period after the Opium Wars. Defeat taught the Chinese that they needed to modernize. But Chinese leaders also worried that accepting Western technology might erode Chinese tradition. What they wanted, Wakeman said, was Western goods without Western ways.
Today Chinese leaders want Western technologies like the Internet while rejecting Western ways like free speech. Says Reporters San Frontiers: “the Chinese Communist Party and the government have deployed colossal human and financial resources to obstruct online free expression.” One anecdote from the report will serve to illustrate. When an editor at the Chinese site Netease ran a self-selecting poll that asked, “Would you like to be reborn Chinese,” about two-thirds of the 10,000 people who responded said no they wouldn’t want to be Chinese again because life was so grim, etc. The government forced the firing of the editor responsible and closed the section he had run.
This is one world, one network. Technologies do not stand still. Either democracy moves East or control moves West.
1 user commented in " Think the Net means democracy? Not in China. "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackNo doubt that we enjoy a level of personal and civil liberties that are unknown in the PRC, where I’ve lived for up to a year at a time and speak Chinese, but I wonder, after watching the evening news on TV, on a variety of channels, in recent weeks, months, years how our “free market” press differs from their “State-controlled” press. US national and local, TV news is riddled with video press releases (or the makings thereof) from various business and government organizations - the equivalent of the CCP propaganda that fuels TV news in the PRC. The way US TV news outlets pick up and run with US government talking points has been pretty obvious for a few years now, at least with respect to the Iraq war and related issues, if it’s not totally obvious in other areas. In fact, I haven’t seen a more cooperative mass media since August 1999 when I was in China to witness the massive propaganda blitz against the Falun Gong meditators. Truly awesome: when I got there, thousands of people on the campus of the huge “key university” where I was staying were getting up and doing the Falun Gong exercises every morning. Within a week after the blitz began, those same people were criticizing Falun Gong as a dangerous criminal and anti-revolutionary force, without cracking a smile. Kind of like the way, I submit, that the US media helped mislead people into backing the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as some sort of meaningful action against the criminals who launched the September 11, 2001 attacks.
So, perhaps “control” will more obviously and openly move West, but imho the press is already pretty well firmly in hand. And, to the degree that bloggers simply choose and repeat one or another of the positions trumpeted in the mainstream media, and fail to do any independent investigating, they’re not above criticism in this regard either.
Just my 2 cents,
Doug
Leave A Reply